Skip to main content

Open decision making

Group decisions used to be so easy to make. The leader of the group made a decision and everyone else listened. The leader may be a manager, a team lead or the alpha in a social group. Was that decision the best one for the group? Did it take everything into account? It didn’t really matter because people didn’t want to buck authority and face the ramifications. This fit very well into the strict hierarchical society that has been slowly eroding for the past 20 years.

Recently, there has been more recognition of the value of collaborative decisions. Leaders started to understand that allowing group members to influence and participate does not lower their standing. Requesting feedback from people before finalizing a decision brings new perspectives, experience and ideas to the table. Just as importantly, it shows the people in your group that you care about what they think and respect their experience and knowledge. Gaining buy-in and ownership of a decision is hugely important today, when you want to empower your group to not only follow a decision, but be passionate about it as well. Passionate people are more likely to put in their full efforts and do whatever it takes to bring it to completion.

So how do you go about starting a collaborative decision process?
These are the 5 stages involved:
  • Early engagement
  • Diverse participants
  • Request feedback and encourage changes
  • Ask for and encourage dissent
  • Incorporate ideas



The first thing you need to engage your group early on in the process. If you already have a full proposal before you start discussing the idea, it will be much more difficult to convince them that you really are interested in what they have to say. Start off with a high level objective and ask, “what can we do to meet this?”. The earlier in the process you start the more ownership and empowerment you will grant to the group.




Having diverse participants in discussions gives you a wider range of perspectives. Diverse can be anything that will cause a different perspective. Men and women often see things differently, as do people who grew up in different cultures. Neurodiversity, different personal situations, race, religion and different professions are all aspects that are going to influence their perspectives. It’s important not to just try to check boxes or make sure that you have an “Asian opinion”. After you ensure that your group is diverse, all ideas expressed should be treated equally.

Make sure that you are encouraging participation and specifically ask people for their input. Keep in mind that if you tell someone that their idea is dumb they will likely not contribute to the discussion anymore. Not every idea is good or appropriate, but try to foment discussion or bring up challenges that will need to be overcome. It could be that while the initial idea can’t be used because of those challenges, when opening the conversation it will suddenly become feasible when someone comes up with a way to overcome the challenges or modify the idea slightly.




Dissent, or disagreement, is an important aspect of making sure that ideas are thoroughly vetted. While the discussion has to be respectful, always relate to the idea when disagreeing and not to the person who suggested it. Ideas that go through the gauntlet and are picked apart, are purified and should be bulletproof by the time the process is complete. So the more you can enable discussion, dissent and disagreement, the better off your idea will be.



Finally, don’t just offer lip service to an inclusive decision making process. You have to actually enable and empower the group to actually influence. Give credit for good ideas. Communicate how the open process bettered the decision. 


This concept is called “Open decision making”, which is very aligned with the open source philosophy that is very prevalent in today’s software development ecosystem. Red Hat, the company I work for, has defined an Open Decision Framework which goes into depth describing how this all works.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reward vs Risk

 When developing a strategy, there are 2 opposing concepts that must be balanced - Risk and Reward. There are two known philosophies to take into account when determining the methodologies: “The best offense is a good defense”.  “The best defense is a good offense” Understanding these 2 philosophies and when each is appropriate, is a key factor in determining a plan of action. Generally speaking, risk and reward are proportionate - the greater risk a person is willing to take (potential loss), the higher the potential for reward. For example, there are different bets you can make at a roulette wheel. If you have $1000 to gamble and pick a specific number to bet it on, you have the opportunity to win $35,000, whereas if you pick red/black you only have the opportunity of winning $1,000. In both cases, the odds are that you are going to lose, but the risk is much greater when choosing a specific number. When choosing an objective, you have to understand what you want to accompli...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stop apologizing and just do it

 There’s a popular phrase, “presentation is everything”. If something is presented in the wrong way, it has a good chance of losing a good deal of appreciation. While most people understand this from a physical perspective - great food that is just piled on your plate is less appreciated than decent food that is carefully presented - this is also true when presenting something written or oral.   When somebody starts off talking by saying, “this probably isn’t going to work, but...” or, “I’m sure there are better ways of doing this…”, expectations drop. Why should they waste their valuable time on something that even the person presenting it doesn’t think is any good. So why do people do this? Nobody likes being wrong. There is a lot of posturing and expressions whose sole purpose is to allow people to save face.  People feel uncomfortable making a statement that they don’t feel confident that they can back up. It is easier to hide behind an excuse than to be proven w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Strategy in your daily life

So how do we use strategy in our everyday life? It should be used whenever you want to achieve something to which there is no obvious answer. While the shortest path between two points is a straight line, it is often not practical or possible to follow it. There are factors and ramifications involved in the different methods and stages of getting from Point A to Point B. Strategy is understanding what is involved, weighing the pros and cons and consciously deciding the best method for you. As a very basic, practical example: You are standing on the corner of a busy street (A) and need to get to the bus stop on the corner diagonal from you. The bus that you need is going to turn left at the corner to get to the bus stop. You need to cross 2 streets to get to that bus stop. Do you first cross From A to B or from A to C? Most people don’t think about it - whichever light turns green first is the road they are going to cross. It is the same distance to the bus stop no matter which ...
Post a Comment
Read more